<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two-tiering: The Demise of Unions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lifecourse.com/2010/03/two-tiering-the-demise-of-unions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lifecourse.com/2010/03/two-tiering-the-demise-of-unions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss</link>
	<description>Neil Howe&#039;s Generational Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: peggy</title>
		<link>http://blog.lifecourse.com/2010/03/two-tiering-the-demise-of-unions/comment-page-1/#comment-5374</link>
		<dc:creator>peggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lifecourse.com/?p=405#comment-5374</guid>
		<description>my believe is that he is going to be re-elected</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my believe is that he is going to be re-elected</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mertyme</title>
		<link>http://blog.lifecourse.com/2010/03/two-tiering-the-demise-of-unions/comment-page-1/#comment-2646</link>
		<dc:creator>mertyme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lifecourse.com/?p=405#comment-2646</guid>
		<description>Good points Patrick. But -- in those examples you give, I see hancock and washington working towards a massive solution to the problem, making tough decisions, austere measures (at times) and the willingness to take a hit on their own businesses to find a solution. (I admittedly don&#039;t know much about James II and Elizabeth&#039;s actions during those 4T.) These traits seem to match what Howe has written about the Nomads: that they are the ones that buckle-down, make the tough calls, and will bring us through a crisis. If Obama is a truly a nomad Gen-Xer, his behaviour thus far does not seem to match the archetype.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.ericmerten.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blog.ericmerten.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points Patrick. But &#8212; in those examples you give, I see hancock and washington working towards a massive solution to the problem, making tough decisions, austere measures (at times) and the willingness to take a hit on their own businesses to find a solution. (I admittedly don&#39;t know much about James II and Elizabeth&#39;s actions during those 4T.) These traits seem to match what Howe has written about the Nomads: that they are the ones that buckle-down, make the tough calls, and will bring us through a crisis. If Obama is a truly a nomad Gen-Xer, his behaviour thus far does not seem to match the archetype.<br /><a href="http://blog.ericmerten.com" rel="nofollow">blog.ericmerten.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsohigian</title>
		<link>http://blog.lifecourse.com/2010/03/two-tiering-the-demise-of-unions/comment-page-1/#comment-2630</link>
		<dc:creator>dsohigian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lifecourse.com/?p=405#comment-2630</guid>
		<description>@Patrick Bowman - great points. Looking further back it does seem like&lt;br&gt;Nomads are more the norm. It will be interesting to see who continues to&lt;br&gt;lead as we head further into the 4T. Of course the Prophets (Boomers)&lt;br&gt;currently control the legislature and this is likely to continue through&lt;br&gt;most of the 4th Turning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Patrick Bowman &#8211; great points. Looking further back it does seem like<br />Nomads are more the norm. It will be interesting to see who continues to<br />lead as we head further into the 4T. Of course the Prophets (Boomers)<br />currently control the legislature and this is likely to continue through<br />most of the 4th Turning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Bowman</title>
		<link>http://blog.lifecourse.com/2010/03/two-tiering-the-demise-of-unions/comment-page-1/#comment-2629</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lifecourse.com/?p=405#comment-2629</guid>
		<description>The idea that Prophets are in charge during a Crisis seems to be less supported than people think, perhaps because of looking at a small sample size of 3 4Ts (WWII, ACW, American Revolution), one of which is an acknowledged &quot;anomaly&quot;. Hancock and Washington in the American Revolution, James II in the Glorious Revolution, and Elizabeth I with the Spanish Armada are all Nomads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea that Prophets are in charge during a Crisis seems to be less supported than people think, perhaps because of looking at a small sample size of 3 4Ts (WWII, ACW, American Revolution), one of which is an acknowledged &#8220;anomaly&#8221;. Hancock and Washington in the American Revolution, James II in the Glorious Revolution, and Elizabeth I with the Spanish Armada are all Nomads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mertyme</title>
		<link>http://blog.lifecourse.com/2010/03/two-tiering-the-demise-of-unions/comment-page-1/#comment-2624</link>
		<dc:creator>mertyme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lifecourse.com/?p=405#comment-2624</guid>
		<description>So, is it certain that Obama is a Nomad / Gen-X ? I was discussing this with my wife, and she brought up an interesting point: all we know about Obama is what he has written himself, which might include his birth certificate (indirectly, of course.) He may not actually be a Gen-Xer for all we know. Interesting. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But..I&#039;m still puzzled. When GW was chosen, it wasn&#039;t a disproportionately large population of Prophet generation doing the choosing. Maybe the Boomer generation isn&#039;t as self-serving as people have written if they will choose someone out of their generation to lead them. Any thoughts on why this would be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, is it certain that Obama is a Nomad / Gen-X ? I was discussing this with my wife, and she brought up an interesting point: all we know about Obama is what he has written himself, which might include his birth certificate (indirectly, of course.) He may not actually be a Gen-Xer for all we know. Interesting. </p>
<p>But..I&#39;m still puzzled. When GW was chosen, it wasn&#39;t a disproportionately large population of Prophet generation doing the choosing. Maybe the Boomer generation isn&#39;t as self-serving as people have written if they will choose someone out of their generation to lead them. Any thoughts on why this would be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsohigian</title>
		<link>http://blog.lifecourse.com/2010/03/two-tiering-the-demise-of-unions/comment-page-1/#comment-2616</link>
		<dc:creator>dsohigian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lifecourse.com/?p=405#comment-2616</guid>
		<description>@Eric, I agree that it is somewhat surprising that we elected a &quot;Nomad&quot; at the start of a crisis. The only other precedent for this was George Washington (also a Nomad) at the start of the Revolutionary crisis. Both the 4th Turnings of the Civil War and WWII saw Prophets in charge (Lincoln and FDR respectively).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eric, I agree that it is somewhat surprising that we elected a &#8220;Nomad&#8221; at the start of a crisis. The only other precedent for this was George Washington (also a Nomad) at the start of the Revolutionary crisis. Both the 4th Turnings of the Civil War and WWII saw Prophets in charge (Lincoln and FDR respectively).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://blog.lifecourse.com/2010/03/two-tiering-the-demise-of-unions/comment-page-1/#comment-2595</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lifecourse.com/?p=405#comment-2595</guid>
		<description>So, does this mean that Barry Soetoro aka Barak Obama is our first Gen-X president? I&#039;m surprised (based on your writings and the general selfishness of the boomer generation) that they would elect a Gen-X president at this time. Your thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, does this mean that Barry Soetoro aka Barak Obama is our first Gen-X president? I&#39;m surprised (based on your writings and the general selfishness of the boomer generation) that they would elect a Gen-X president at this time. Your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

